Predicting Prosthetic Mobility at Discharge From Rehabilitation Following Major Amputation in Vascular Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to construct a decision aid to estimate the likelihood of independence with a prosthesis following rehabilitation for limb loss secondary to advanced ischaemia (acute or chronic limb threatening ischaemia) or diabetic foot disease (DFD). A secondary aim was to determine whether prosthetic independence is a surrogate marker of long term survival. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of unilateral amputations due to ischaemia or DFD entering rehabilitation between 2007 and 2020 was performed. Predictors of independent prosthetic mobility (IPM) were used in construction of the IPM prediction model, which underwent bootstrap internal and criterion validation through correlation with predictors of other measures of function: Timed Up and Go (TUG) and two minute walk test. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to address the secondary aim. RESULTS: Of the 771 patients included, only 49.9% of amputees achieved IPM. Independent negative predictors of IPM were age > 75 years, female sex, higher amputation level, active malignancy, cerebrovascular disease, end stage renal disease, and cognitive impairment. The model yielded high discrimination (C statistic 0.778), and internal validation was demonstrated with bootstrapping (C statistic 0.778), confirming no over optimism. There was a strong correlation between IPM, TUG, and two minute distance and their predictors, confirming strong criterion validity. The IPM group had a median survival of 93.7 (80.7, 105) months, whereas the non-IPM group fared worse with a median survival of 56.6 (48.5, 66.7) months (p < .001). CONCLUSION: An internally validated decision aid for estimating the likelihood of independence with a prosthesis after major amputation was constructed. A strong association between female sex and poorer prosthetic mobility was observed. Prosthetic function was shown to be a surrogate marker of long term survival. Future research will involve external validation studies to confirm the generalisability of the decision aid in clinical practice.

Antithrombotic drugs for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with lower limb peripheral arterial disease: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal antithrombotic regimen to reduce the risk of vascular events in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is contentious. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to define the relative efficacy and risks of previously investigated antithrombotic medication regimens in preventing major cardiovascular events, vascular limb events and mortality in patients with PAD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A peer-reviewed, systematic search will be executed in English on Medline, Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), Web of Science and Google Scholar databases in late 2022. The WHO International Clinical Trials Registry platform will also be searched for ongoing trials. Abstracts will be screened independently by two researchers for randomised controlled trials meeting the review criteria. All associated publications including the study protocol will be sought and evaluated together against prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two researchers will extract the data into a prepiloted extraction form. Risk-of-bias assessments will be performed using the Cochrane 'Risk-of-Bias V.2' criteria by individuals with domain expertise. All differences will be resolved by consensus or a third individual for ties.Included trials will be summarised. An NMA will be performed, subject to checks of assumptions. Both primary and secondary outcomes will be analysed on a whole network basis. Pairwise comparisons and league tables will be produced. Prespecified subgroup analyses will include sex, ethnicity, disease status, conservative versus interventional management and key comorbidities. The findings will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation, informed by patient and public involvement work. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This is a systematic review of data in the public domain and does not require ethical approval. Dissemination will include presentations to key vascular and patient organisations, publication in a peer-reviewed journal and an open-access repository of the study data. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023389262.

Association between statin-use and mobility and long-term survival after major lower limb amputation.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine if there is an association between statin-use and prosthetic mobility and long-term survival in patients receiving rehabilitation after major amputation for lower limb arterial disease. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data (2008-2020) from a centre for rehabilitation was performed. Patients were grouped by statin-use status and sub-grouped by the combination of statin and antithrombotic drugs (antiplatelets or anticoagulants). Outcomes were prosthetic mobility (SIGAM score, timed-up-go and 2-min walking distance) and long-term survival. Regression, Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional hazard analyses were performed to test associations adjusted to confounders. RESULTS: Of 771 patients, 499 (64.7%) were on a statin before amputation or prescribed a statin peri-operatively. Rate of statin-use was significantly lower among female (53.3%) compared to male (68.2%) patients, P < 0.001. Statin-use was associated with significantly better prosthetic independence (53.1% vs 44.1%, P = 0.017), timed-up-go (mean difference of 4 s, P = 0.04) and long-term survival HR 0.59 (0.48-0.72, P < 0.001). Significance persisted after adjusting for confounding factors and in subgroup analyses. The combination of statin with antiplatelet was associated with the most superior survival, HR 0.51 (0.40-0.65, P < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis (exclusion of non-users of prosthesis) showed that statin-use remained a significant indicator of longer survival, maximally when combined with antiplatelet use HR 0.52 (0.39-0.68, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Statin-use is associated with better mobility and long-term survival in rehabilitees after limb loss, particularly when used in combination with antiplatelets. Significantly lower rates of statin-use were observed in female patients. Further research is warranted on gender disparities in statin-use and causality in their association with improved mobility and survival.

An International Comparison of the Management of Gastrointestinal Surgical Emergencies in Octogenarians-England Versus United States: A National Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the United States and England for the utilization of surgical intervention and in-hospital mortality from 5 gastrointestinal emergencies in octogenarians. BACKGROUND: The proportion of older adults is growing and will represent a substantial challenge to clinicians in the next decade. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2012, the rate of surgical intervention and in-hospital mortality for 5 index conditions for octogenarians were compared between the United States and England: appendicitis, incarcerated/strangulated abdominal hernia, perforation of esophagus, small or large bowel, and peptic ulcer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for underlying differences in patient demographics. RESULTS: Thirty-two thousand one hundred fifty-one admissions of octogenarians in England for 5 index surgical emergencies were compared with 162,142 admissions in the USA.Surgical intervention was significantly more common in the USA than in England for all 5 conditions: appendicitis [odds ratio (OR) 4.63, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 4.21-5.09], abdominal hernia (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.97-2.15), perforated esophagus (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.31-2.24), small and large bowel perforation (OR 4.33, 95% CI 4.12-4.56), and peptic ulcer perforation (OR 4.63, 95% CI 4.27-5.02). In-hospital mortality was significantly more common in England than in the USA for all 5 conditions: appendicitis (OR 3.22, 95% CI 2.73-3.78), abdominal hernia (OR 3.49, 95% CI 3.29-3.70), perforated esophagus (OR 4.06, 95% CI 3.03-5.44), small and large bowel perforation (OR 6.97, 95% CI 6.60-7.37), and peptic ulcer perforation (OR 3.67, 95% CI 3.40-3.96). CONCLUSION: Surgery is used less commonly in England for emergency gastrointestinal conditions in octogenarians, which may be associated with a high rate of in-hospital mortality from these conditions compared with the USA.

Variations in arterial pedal circulation in idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus: a systematic review.

Variations in pedal circulation in congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) are well documented. There is a reported risk of vascular injury to the posterior tibial artery (PTA) during operative procedures for CTEV, potentially leading to necrosis and amputation. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the most common anomalies in arterial pedal circulation in CTEV and to determine the relevance of these to clinical practice. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO and was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines by two independent reviewers. Studies that examined pedal circulation in idiopathic CTEV were included. Articles that studied nonidiopathic CTEV and those not published in English were excluded. Data extracted included patient demographics, imaging modalities, and findings. A total of 14 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria, including 192 patients (279 clubfeet), aged 0-13.5 years, at various stages in their treatment. Imaging modalities included arteriography (n = 5), duplex ultrasound (n = 5), magnetic resonance angiography (n = 2), and direct visualization intraoperatively (n = 2). The dorsalis pedis was most frequently reported as absent (21.5%), and the anterior tibial artery (ATA) was most frequently reported as hypoplastic (18.3%). Where reported (n = 36 feet), 61% of patients were noted to have a dominant supply from the PTA. The most common variation in pedal circulation in CTEV is diminished supply from ATA and dorsalis pedis, although there are documented anomalies in all of the vessels supplying the foot. We therefore recommend routine Doppler ultrasound imaging prior to operative intervention in CTEV.

Migration and sac expansion as modes of midterm therapeutic failure after endovascular aneurysm sealing.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) is a disruptive technology to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The use of sac filling rather than endograft fixation was designed to treat aortic aneurysms in a wide range of morphologic appearances and to reduce endoleaks. There are few data reporting outcomes beyond postoperative follow-up. This study reports outcomes up to 5 years for Nellix (Endologix, Irvine, Calif) EVAS. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for EVAS patients from the time of adoption of EVAS in 2013. All patients treated with the Nellix device are included in this study, and as such, it reports on infrarenal, ruptured, and iliac aneurysms as well as the Nellix-in-Nellix application. Juxtarenal and suprarenal aneurysms were treated using the EVAS system with parallel grafts into the visceral vessels and are included. Therapeutic failure, a composite outcome of migration, sac expansion >5 mm, type Ia and type Ib endoleak, and secondary aortic rupture, was the primary outcome along with all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related mortality, and reintervention rates. RESULTS: There were 295 EVAS cases undertaken between March 2013 and July 2018. Indications for treatment were infrarenal (n = 185), juxtarenal and suprarenal (n = 73), ruptured (n = 18), and iliac (n = 13) aneurysms. There were 15 reinterventions using the Nellix-in-Nellix application. In some cases, EVAS was used to salvage failing endovascular or open aneurysm repairs. Median follow-up was 2.42 years (interquartile range, 1.07-3.57 years). Therapeutic failure was observed in 98 of the 295 cases (33.2%) overall and exceeded 50% in some subgroups. In 71 cases (24.1%), reintervention was performed, with reasons for no reintervention being mainly physiologic. Complications leading to therapeutic failure were most commonly seen beyond 2 years of follow-up. There were 15 secondary ruptures (5.36%), and 9 EVAS devices required explantation either electively or for aortic rupture. CONCLUSIONS: EVAS with the Nellix device has not met expectations, and early encouraging results have been eroded. The incidence of therapeutic failure has been high, occurring 2 years and beyond after implantation. The Nellix system has been voluntarily recalled by Endologix, and the CE mark has subsequently been suspended. The adoption of EVAS as a disruptive technology highlights the need for cautious adoption of novel technologies and the strict governance around such arrangements.

Comparison of Surgical Intervention and Mortality for Seven Surgical Emergencies in England and the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences between England and the USA in the rate of surgical intervention and in-hospital mortality for 7 index surgical emergencies. BACKGROUND: Considerable international variation exists in the configuration, provision, and outcomes of emergency healthcare. METHODS: Patients aged <80 years hospitalized with 1 of 7 surgical emergencies (ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, appendicitis, perforated esophagus, peptic ulcer, small bowel or large bowel, and incarcerated or strangulated hernias) were identified from English Hospital Episode Statistics and the USA Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2006-2012) and classified by whether they received a corrective surgical intervention. The rates of surgical intervention and population mortality were compared between England and the USA after adjustment for patient demographic factors. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2012, there were 136,047 admissions in English hospitals and 1,863,626 admissions in US hospitals due to the index surgical emergencies.Proportion of patients receiving no surgical intervention, for all 7 conditions was greater in the England (OR 4.25, 1.55, 8.53, 1.92, 2.06, 2.42, 1.75) and population in-hospital mortality was greater in England (OR 1.34, 1.67, 2.22, 1.65, 2.7, 4.46, 3.22) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, appendicitis, perforated esophagus, peptic ulcer, small bowel or large bowel, and incarcerated or strangulated hernias respectively.In England (where follow-up was available), lack of utilization of surgery was also associated with increased in-hospital and long-term mortality for all conditions. CONCLUSION: England and US hospitals differ in the threshold for surgical intervention, which may be associated with increases in mortality in England for these 7 general surgical emergencies.

Multicentre Post-EVAR Surveillance Evaluation Study (EVAR-SCREEN).

OBJECTIVE: Surveillance imaging is considered mandatory after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), but many patients are lost to follow up and the impact of this is poorly understood. This study aimed to examine compliance with post-operative surveillance in the UK and the impact of mal-/non-compliance on endograft re-interventions and survival. METHODS: EVAR-SCREEN centres reported EVAR for intact infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2010, with follow up included up to 31 July 2014. Non-compliance was defined by the presence of a single 18 month period in which no surveillance imaging was performed. The outcomes were reported in compliant and non-compliant groups with survival analysis. RESULTS: EVAR was performed in 1414 patients in 10 UK centres. At the end of the study period there were 378 patients with five years of follow up available for analysis. Compliance with surveillance was 66% (61-68%). Compliance varied widely, from 9% to 88% between centres. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05; p = .02) and distance from hospital (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01; p < .001) were independent predictors of non-compliance. Non-compliant patients had lower all cause mortality in the first three years after EVAR, whereas compliant patients had lower all cause mortality 4-5 years after EVAR (p < .001). No significant difference in re-intervention rates was found between compliant and non-compliant patients. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients were non-compliant with surveillance after EVAR in the UK with considerable variation between centres. The survival benefit for EVAR after three years appeared to be related to compliance with surveillance which has implications for the future delivery of EVAR.

Midterm results of endovascular aneurysm sealing to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) represents a novel approach to the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. It uses polymer technology to achieve an anatomic seal within the sac of the aneurysm. This cohort study reports the early clinical outcomes, technical refinements, and learning curve during the initial EVAS experience at a single institution. METHODS: Results from 150 consecutive EVAS cases for intact, infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms are reported here. These cases were undertaken between March 2013 and July 2015. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected for each patient prospectively. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 76.6 years (interquartile range, 70.2-80.9 years), and 87.3% were male. Median aneurysm diameter was 62.0 mm (IQR, 58.0-69.0 mm). Adverse neck morphology was seen in 69 (46.0%) patients, including aneurysm neck length <10 mm (17.3%), neck diameter >32 mm or <18 mm (8.7%), and neck angulation >60 degrees (15.3%). Median follow-up was 687 days (IQR, 463-897 days); 37 patients (24.7%) underwent reintervention. The rates of unresolved endoleak are 1.3% type IA, 0.7% type IB, and 2.7% type I. There were no type III endoleaks. There have been seven secondary ruptures in this cohort; all but one of these patients survived after reintervention. Only one rupture occurred in an aneurysm that had been treated within the manufacturer's instructions for use (IFU). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of unresolved endoleaks is satisfactorily low. The incidence of secondary rupture is of concern; however, when the IFU are adhered to, the rate is very low. The results of this study suggest that working within the IFU yields better clinical results.

Short Stay EVAR is Safe and Cost Effective.

OBJECTIVE: Reducing length of stay (LOS) following surgery offers the potential to improve resource utilisation. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is now delivered with a low level of morbidity and as such may be deliverable as a "23 hour stay" intervention. This systematic review aims to assess safety, feasibility and cost effectiveness of a short stay EVAR pathway. METHODS: A database search of Ovid MEDLINE (1996 - April 2018) and Embase (1974 - April 2018) was completed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. A Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied to assess study bias. RESULTS: In total, 570 papers were identified through the literature search, of which 32 abstracts were screened. This led to nine papers being assessed for eligibility. From five suitable studies, 450 (75%) patients were successfully discharged the same or next day after EVAR. Complications most often occurred within 3 hours of surgery, and major complications requiring intensive treatment unit admission occurred within 6 hours. Readmission rates were 0-5% for those discharged early, with no difference in 30 day readmission. Early discharge led to a statistically significant cost saving of £13,360 (LOS four days) to £9844 (LOS one day). CONCLUSION: Selected patients can safely undergo EVAR using a short stay pathway. A period of monitoring 6 h post-operatively for low risk patients would be sufficient. Reducing length of stay after EVAR in the UK from the current median of three days to 1.5 days would free 4361 bed days and lead to a saving of approximately £1,800,000 annually.

Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Chronic Type B Dissection Treatment: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The respective place of endovascular repair (ER) versus open surgery (OS) in thoracic dissecting aneurysm treatment remains debatable. This comprehensive review seeks to compare the outcomes of ER versus OS in chronic type B aortic dissection treatment. METHODS: Embase and Medline searches (2000 to 2017) were performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Outcomes data extracted comprised (1) early mortality and major complications: stroke, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), dialysis, and respiratory complications; and (2) late survival and reinterventions. Reintervention causes were divided into proximal, adjacent, and distal. Comparative studies allowed comparative meta-analysis. Noncomparative studies were analyzed in pooled proportion meta-analyses for each group. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were identified after exclusions, of which 4 were comparative. Comparative meta-analysis demonstrated lower early mortality for ER (odds ratio [OR], 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10 to 15.4), stroke (OR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.02 to 18.35), SCI (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 0.97 to 11.25), and respiratory complications (OR, 6.88; 95% CI,1.52 to 31.02), but higher reintervention rate (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.69). Midterm survival was similar (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.42 to 3.32). Noncomparative studies demonstrated that most reinterventions were related to the aortic segment distal to primary intervention in both groups (OS 73%, ER 59%). Reintervention procedures were mainly surgical for OS (85%), mainly endovascular for ER (75%). Rupture rates were 1.2% (OS) and 3% (ER). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair is associated with significant early benefits, but this is not sustained at midterm. Reintervention is more frequent, but the OS is not exempt from reintervention or late rupture. Both techniques have their place, but patient selection is key.

An arterioarterial prosthetic graft as an alternative option for haemodialysis access: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: All arteriovenous fistula/grafts options should be exhausted before haemodialysis is carried out via central venous catheters (CVC). CVCs carry high morbidity and mortality risks and in some patients, the central veins could be exhausted. In these patients, an arterioarterial prosthetic loop (AAPL) or straight graft can be the only option for haemodialysis. A systematic review was thus carried out to look at the use of arterioarterial graft for haemodialysis, with regards to dialysis adequacy, complications, and patency rates. METHODS: An electronic search was performed using the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases from inception until June 2017. Study retrieval was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of eight studies published between 1976 and 2017 were identified for pooled analysis. The studies were retrospective cohort in design and reported data on 151 patients. Primary patency rate ranged from 67%-94.5% at six months to 54%-61% at 36 months, with secondary patency rates from 83%-93% at six months to 72%-87% at 36 months. All studies documented satisfactory haemodialysis. Although limited by the size of the cohort of patients studied, patients with end-to-side grafts did not suffer from distal ischaemia when the graft occluded unlike patients who had their graft sutured as end-to-end. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the potential benefit of arterioarterial grafts for dialysis as an alternative vascular access option. As a result, this review calls for registry-based multicentre study to evaluate this treatment arm as an alternative option when all AVF/AVG options are exhausted.

Feature selection through validation and un-censoring of endovascular repair survival data for predicting the risk of re-intervention.

BACKGROUND: Feature selection (FS) process is essential in the medical area as it reduces the effort and time needed for physicians to measure unnecessary features. Choosing useful variables is a difficult task with the presence of censoring which is the unique characteristic in survival analysis. Most survival FS methods depend on Cox's proportional hazard model; however, machine learning techniques (MLT) are preferred but not commonly used due to censoring. Techniques that have been proposed to adopt MLT to perform FS with survival data cannot be used with the high level of censoring. The researcher's previous publications proposed a technique to deal with the high level of censoring. It also used existing FS techniques to reduce dataset dimension. However, in this paper a new FS technique was proposed and combined with feature transformation and the proposed uncensoring approaches to select a reduced set of features and produce a stable predictive model. METHODS: In this paper, a FS technique based on artificial neural network (ANN) MLT is proposed to deal with highly censored Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR). Survival data EVAR datasets were collected during 2004 to 2010 from two vascular centers in order to produce a final stable model. They contain almost 91% of censored patients. The proposed approach used a wrapper FS method with ANN to select a reduced subset of features that predict the risk of EVAR re-intervention after 5 years to patients from two different centers located in the United Kingdom, to allow it to be potentially applied to cross-centers predictions. The proposed model is compared with the two popular FS techniques; Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AIC, BIC) that are used with Cox's model. RESULTS: The final model outperforms other methods in distinguishing the high and low risk groups; as they both have concordance index and estimated AUC better than the Cox's model based on AIC, BIC, Lasso, and SCAD approaches. These models have p-values lower than 0.05, meaning that patients with different risk groups can be separated significantly and those who would need re-intervention can be correctly predicted. CONCLUSION: The proposed approach will save time and effort made by physicians to collect unnecessary variables. The final reduced model was able to predict the long-term risk of aortic complications after EVAR. This predictive model can help clinicians decide patients' future observation plan.

A Systematic Review of Predictors of Reintervention After EVAR: Guidance for Risk-Stratified Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Current surveillance protocols after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are ineffective and costly. Stratifying surveillance by individual risk of reintervention requires an understanding of the factors involved in developing post-EVAR complications. This systematic review assessed risk factors for reintervention after EVAR and proposals for stratified surveillance. METHODS: A systematic search according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases to identify studies reporting on risk factors predicting reintervention after EVAR and proposals for stratified surveillance. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies reporting on 39 898 patients met the primary inclusion criteria for reporting predictors of reintervention or aortic complications with or without suggestions for stratified surveillance. Five secondary studies described external validation of risk scores for reintervention or aortic complications. There was great heterogeneity in reporting risk factors identified at the pre-EVAR, intraoperative, and post-EVAR stages of treatment, although large preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was the most commonly observed risk factor for reintervention after EVAR. CONCLUSION: Existing data on predictors of post-EVAR complications are generally of poor quality and largely derived from retrospective studies. Few studies describing suggestions for stratified surveillance have been subjected to external validation. There is a need to refine risk prediction for EVAR failure and to conduct prospective comparative studies of personalized surveillance with standard practice.

Systematic Review of Reintervention After Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Chronic Type B Dissection.

This review analyzed the incidence, mechanisms, and risk factors of aortic-related reintervention after endovascular repair of chronic dissections. The systematic review identified 28 studies describing 1,249 patients at median 27 months follow-up (range, 10.3 to 64.4). There were six reinterventions, 0.7 ruptures, and 1.2 surgical conversions per 100 patient-years of follow-up. Stent-related reinterventions were more frequent than nonstent related (80.2% vs 19.8%). Distal false lumen perfusion was the most common complication (40.5%). No individual risk factor-treatment timing, disease extent, covered aorta length, or remodelling-was associated with reintervention. Further investigation based on consistent reporting standards is required.

Early outcomes after left subclavian artery revascularisation in association with thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Approximately 40-50% of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair require left subclavian artery coverage for adequate proximal landing zone. Many of these patients undergo left subclavian artery revascularisation. However, outcomes data for left subclavian artery revascularisation in the context of thoracic endovascular aortic repair remain limited. In this study, 70 left subclavian artery revascularisation procedures, performed on thoracic endovascular aortic repair patients at a tertiary hospital, were retrospectively reviewed. Particular emphasis was placed on revascularisation-related outcomes during staging interval between revascularisation and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Forty-six (66%) carotid-subclavian bypass, 17 (24%) carotid-carotid-subclavian bypass and 7 (10%) aorto-inominate-carotid-subclavian bypass procedures were performed. There were no strokes or mortalities following left subclavian artery revascularisation procedures alone. Three (10%) minor complications occurred including a seroma, a haematoma and a temporary neuropraxia. Separation of complications following left subclavian artery revascularisation from those of the associated thoracic endovascular aortic repair can be difficult. Early outcomes data from patients who underwent left subclavian artery revascularisation in isolation indicate that the procedure is safe with low complication rates.